The Black Lives Matter network (or Movement for Black Lives) stunned its critics and observers by coming up with a platform and list of six policy demands. After a year of organizing and intense deliberations, BLM waited until the end of the Democratic National Convention in Philly to make its announcement.
Criticized as nothing more than a bunch of young rabble-rousers who like to take to the street but don’t have any vision, one might think this was a big step forward for BLM, right? Not to the media.
According to various major media critics, this movement of young black people’s weaknesses include not having an identifiable leader; not speaking the “language” of white America; failing to court the African-American church; coming up with demands that don’t “poll well;” and failing to address black-on-black violence.
Let’s see what they said. “We are a collective that centers and is rooted in Black communities, but we recognize we have a shared struggle with all oppressed people; collective liberation will be a product of all of our work.” And who are these oppressed people? Who oppresses them?
“While this platform is focused on domestic policies, we know that patriarchy, exploitative capitalism, militarism, and white supremacy know no borders. We stand in solidarity with our international family against the ravages of global capitalism and anti-Black racism, human-made climate change, war, and exploitation.”
No tired, John Lewis preacher-style pandering to liberals nostalgic for the 1950s and early 1960s here. No more mild rhetoric from people who used to breathe fire but are now thoroughly owned by neo-liberal Democratic Party money.
Over the past two years, they’ve rebuffed attempts to take over their movement by the likes of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and Cornell West. These young people know their history, know how to organize in the 21st century, and know that their interests do not lie in selling out for praise from their enemies. For now, at least, there are no “super star” leaders to be coopted. Just a growing, increasingly sophisticated collective of people who know that black — and all oppressed — lives matter.
Pittsburgh-area young people have been on the move too, as the large July demonstrations downtown demonstrate. Opportunists are always lurking, however, just as honest disputes will arise. Go to this website for official information on BLM: http://blacklivesmatter.com/.
And throw away the key?
Critics accuse African-Americans who are opposed to police killings of our people of ignoring black-on-black violence. We need not listen to them; their intentions are suspect. We don’t expect the average white person to be privy to conversations in our homes and communities, but can’t they see the “Stop Shooting/We Love You” signs in windows and lawns where African-Americans live? Are they unaware of the long-running New Pittsburgh Courier front-page campaign to embarrass and mobilize the black community by running a weekly tally of black homicide victims?
Yes, the poor and oppressed victimize their fellow poor and oppressed people. Take the case of young Eric Taylor, of Duquesne. Earlier this month, the 17-year-old was sentenced to 22 1/2 to 45 years in prison for a crime he allegedly committed when he was just 15. The story goes something like this:
In 2014, young Taylor is said to have shot a pregnant 15-year-old girl (motive unclear), whose baby died. LeRoy Powell — again, just 15 years old — testified at Taylor’s preliminary hearing. District Attorney Stephen Zappala’s office made Powell’s testimony public — his name was all over the news — and he was shot down in broad daylight just days later. The DA’s office later admitted that it “might not have” fully explained the risks to young Powell and his family or offered protection. No one has ever been charged with Powell’s murder.
In sentencing Eric Taylor so harshly, Judge David Cashman said he took into consideration the fact that Taylor had committed two armed robberies at age 13. Two armed robberies at 13 and a deadly gun crime at 15?! Did Cashman consider what could have happened in the life of a child to cause him to behave so? Does he, or any of those people who self-righteously condemn people like Eric Taylor, know or care?
The City of Duquesne is a glaring example of the results of deindustrialization, disinvestment and just plain abandonment by those politicians and capitalists who concoct what passes for social policy in the United States today.
In 2010, the average household income in Duquesne was just half the state average. Its school district is so underfunded that it closed its high school, which had produced state champions in football and basketball, in 2009. In 2012, it closed its middle school. At its one remaining elementary school, 100 percent of the kids qualify for free or reduced-price meals, a fourth receive special education services, and less than one percent are designated gifted. What the hell kind of place is that in which to grow up?
Is 17-year-old Eric Taylor related to — perhaps even the son of — another Eric Taylor of Duquesne, an alleged heroin kingpin, who was murdered in 2000? Or perhaps he knew Terron Taylor, who was sentenced to prison for involvement in the same heroin ring, which also claimed as a member former Duquesne High School and Duquesne University basketball star Kevin Price?
What other life did young Taylor know? What did Duquesne, the Mon Valley, Pittsburgh or US society have to offer him? Or the older Eric Taylor, Terron Taylor, or even Kevin Price once his basketball days were over? Is locking up a 17-year-old kid for the next two to four decades the answer?
The Black Lives Matter network doesn’t think so. Among other things, they call for economic justice and demand “investments in the education, health and safety of Black people, instead of investments in the criminalizing, caging, and harming of Black people.”
So should we. Eric Taylor, LeRoy Powell, and the young lady who was shot and lost her baby all deserve a better life.
— James Collins